We had an excellent chat on the Saturday TDRC "fun" net on 40m between one other station and I. I had an opportunity to demonstrate the various capabilities of the FLDIGI suite to transfer files and emails from station to station.
There was some fading on the band right after the start of the net, which made higher speed PSK-125 and PSK-250 difficult.
For similar data throughput, we changed to MFSK-16 and had 100% copy at almost the same data rate. Keep in mind that MFSK has some FEC (forward error correction) built into it, plus the mode is generally more resistant to fading and other "intermittent" sources of interference.
We may consider MFSK-32 as a mode for our APRS experiments!
INNOVATE. EXPERIMENT. EDUCATE. Tulsa, OK / Broken Arrow, OK news and experiments in digital radio.
Monday, May 4, 2015
Friday, May 1, 2015
Different flavors of Olivia
It would appear that most nets have standardized on Olivia 8-500, which has a decent tradeoff in terms of speed vs. reliability.
However, Olivia is not limited strictly to 8-500 (which stands for 8 carrier/500 Hz).
Was having problems copying a station last night on our net on 80m. I was able to switch from Olivia 8-500 to Olivia 8-250. That reduced the required s/n from -11 dB to -14 dB. Suddenly we went from 35-50% copy to 100% copy, as the other station's signal was fluctuating between -9 and -12 dB. Of course, we also took a 50% cut in data throughput when we reduced the bandwidth from 500 Hz to 250 Hz. However, 100% copy at 50% speed beats 35% copy at full speed any time!
Here is a sort summary of how the different types of Olivia compare (courtesy of the W1HKJ web site for FLDIGI):
However, Olivia is not limited strictly to 8-500 (which stands for 8 carrier/500 Hz).
Was having problems copying a station last night on our net on 80m. I was able to switch from Olivia 8-500 to Olivia 8-250. That reduced the required s/n from -11 dB to -14 dB. Suddenly we went from 35-50% copy to 100% copy, as the other station's signal was fluctuating between -9 and -12 dB. Of course, we also took a 50% cut in data throughput when we reduced the bandwidth from 500 Hz to 250 Hz. However, 100% copy at 50% speed beats 35% copy at full speed any time!
Here is a sort summary of how the different types of Olivia compare (courtesy of the W1HKJ web site for FLDIGI):
Mode | Baud | WPM | Duty Cycle | BW (Hz) | Modulation | S/N | ITU | RSID-1 | RSID-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLIVIA-4-250 | 63 | 20 | 100.00% | 250 | 4-FSK | -12 dB | 250HF1B | 75 | |
OLIVIA-8-250 | 31 | 15 | 100.00% | 250 | 8-FSK | -14 dB | 250HF1B | 69 | |
OLIVIA-4-500 | 125 | 40 | 100.00% | 500 | 4-FSK | -10 dB | 500HF1B | 74 | |
OLIVIA-8-500 | 63 | 30 | 100.00% | 500 | 8-FSK | -11 dB | 500HF1B | 72 | |
OLIVIA-16-500 | 31 | 20 | 100.00% | 500 | 16-FSK | -13 dB | 500HF1B | 70 | |
OLIVIA-8-1000 | 125 | 58 | 100.00% | 1000 | 8-FSK | - 7 dB | 1K00F1B | 116 | |
OLIVIA-16-1000 | 63 | 40 | 100.00% | 1000 | 16-FSK | -10 dB | 1K00F1B | 73 | |
OLIVIA-32-1000 | 31 | 24 | 100.00% | 1000 | 32-FSK | -12 dB | 1K00F1B | 71 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)